Comparison
EBITDA multiple vs. SDE
The difference between valuing a larger SME and valuing an owner-led micro business.
What are you trying to decide?
EBITDA multiple and SDE are both profit-driven methods, but they are not meant for the same kind of company. EBITDA multiple fits businesses where a market-rate management salary makes sense. SDE is built for smaller businesses where the owner remains central to operations and earnings. Keeping that distinction clear avoids the wrong expectations with clients and buyers.
EBITDA multiple
Use EBITDA multiple for larger, more scalable SMEs where normalized profit is a good base for market comparison.
Read about this method →SDE
Use SDE for micro-SMEs and sole proprietorships where owner compensation and personal choices still strongly shape results.
Read about this method →The main differences
| Criterion | EBITDA multiple | SDE |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Larger scalable SMEs | Owner-led micro businesses |
| Profit lens | Normalized EBITDA | Owner benefit |
| Typical buyer view | Business as scalable asset | Business as owner-operated income stream |
How to make the choice
Upswitch helps you quickly see which methodology fits the business profile. That gives you a report that matches the reality of the company and the language the counterparty expects.
- Use SDE when the owner is still deeply involved in the business.
- Use EBITDA multiple when you reason from normalized operating earnings at company level.
- Use both only as an extra check when the case sits between both profiles.
Frequently asked questions
Turn this into a client report
Use Upswitch to test both methods, compare the outcome, and share one report with your client.
Free includes 3 valuations with 6 methods. Starter unlocks all 10 methods, branded reports, and client sharing.
Related comparisons
EBITDA multiple vs. DCF
Two strong methods for advisors. The right choice depends on stability, growth trajectory, and the story you need to defend.
Adjusted NAV vs. EBITDA multiple
The choice between intrinsic asset value and earnings-driven market value.
Fiscal reference value vs. EBITDA multiple
The fiscal reference alongside market value. Essential in Belgian transfer cases.